Comment by Samantha Wate on August 1, 2012 at 6:58am
Comment by Lemons and Rosemary on August 1, 2012 at 9:17am what happened to the blonde hair pink streaked? im so going to miss the lolly pop. whas their definition of ridley?
Comment by lena D on August 1, 2012 at 8:43pm physical features doesnt matter she is a really good actress look on the bright side of things
ridley has LONG BLONDE hair witha a pink streak. What happened whats next, no lollipop. Appereance wise for the movie not so good.
Comment by Samantha Wate on August 2, 2012 at 6:22pm
Comment by Samantha Wate on August 2, 2012 at 6:24pm
Comment by camile on August 2, 2012 at 7:44pm i get that shes a great actress but the movie HAS to bring out the image and the scnery of the book, because all beautiful creatures fans visualized EVERYTHING they read based on the descripition given, making the image we saw in our minds coorespooding to the book. Thus bringing out the characters, personality, how they dressed, their features all helped describe who they are... if you neglected that in a movie based on vivid descripition given in a book even though you have a great cast, the movie will not be as great, it will neglect many things,
Comment by Samantha Wate on August 2, 2012 at 8:48pm
Comment by Lemons and Rosemary on August 4, 2012 at 3:06pm I liked Ridley in the book more. Her image in the movie doesn't match her characteristic. Emmy Rosoum is a great actress but still its important to try and make the main characters look how they're descibed in the book take twilight for example everyone in the movie is descibed how they are in the book, why not Beautiful Creatures?
Comment by Felicia on August 4, 2012 at 4:14pm She just doesn't look right But hey to make a movie you have to give some stuff up right but usealy is just tiny little inconvinent things for time not a characture's look!
© 2013 Created by Little, Brown Books.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Beautiful Creatures Novels to add comments!
Join Beautiful Creatures Novels